The Archdiocese of Chicago pulled a well-known South Side priest from his parish on July 11, 2026 after a fresh allegation of child sexual abuse dating to the mid-1990s, the fifth accusation lodged against him since 2021, and a case that tests how far a diocese's internal process actually reaches.
Reviewed by Survivor Justice Alliance · Updated 2026-07-14
Figures compiled from Archdiocese of Chicago statements and Illinois's civil statute of limitations for childhood sexual abuse.
In a letter dated July 11, 2026, the Cardinal told parishioners that a new allegation of child sexual abuse had been brought against the longtime pastor of a well-known South Side parish, describing conduct alleged to have occurred more than thirty years earlier, between 1993 and 1995. He wrote that he had asked the priest to pause his duties and relocate away from the rectory during the review.
The archdiocese says the allegation was reported to police in keeping with its child-protection policy, and that the woman who came forward was offered access to victim-assistance services. An interim pastor has been assigned to lead the parish during the investigation, though the priest's ultimate status will depend on what that review finds.
This is the fifth sexual abuse allegation brought against the same priest in roughly five years. A 2021 accusation involving conduct alleged to have occurred more than four decades earlier led to his temporary removal from ministry, but Illinois child welfare investigators reviewing that claim found no credible evidence to support it. A second allegation surfaced in 2022 involving conduct said to have occurred in the 1980s, and that claim was likewise resolved in his favor.
Parishioners at the South Side church have largely rallied behind him, with congregants reportedly applauding when the archdiocese's letter was read aloud at Sunday Mass. The priest himself has rejected the newest claim outright, and the Cardinal, for his part, stressed in the letter that no allegation is presumed true or false while a review is still underway.
Illinois eliminated its civil filing deadline for childhood sexual abuse occurring on or after January 1, 2014, meaning survivors of more recent abuse can sue at any point in their lives. Abuse alleged to have happened in the 1990s, as in this case, falls under the older rule: a survivor generally has until their 38th birthday, or within 20 years of connecting an injury to the abuse, whichever comes later, to file a civil claim.
That distinction matters well beyond this one case. It means the calendar-based deadlines that shaped so much of the older clergy-abuse litigation nationally, and that drove many states toward the temporary revival windows now spreading region by region, still apply in full to Illinois claims tied to abuse from the 1990s and earlier.
Institutions handling repeat allegations against the same person face a genuine tension: repeated accusations that are each investigated and not substantiated can either reflect a pattern being missed, or a pattern of false claims against a public figure, and an internal review alone often cannot definitively settle which. That is precisely why independent review, consistent reporting to police, and support for the person making the allegation all matter regardless of how any single investigation concludes.
For survivors specifically, none of this diocesan process determines whether a civil claim would succeed. A civil case turns on evidence and applicable deadlines, litigated in court, entirely separate from whatever an archdiocese's internal review decides.
Regardless of outcome, a credible internal process tends to include the same core steps.
The Survivor Justice Alliance is an attorney alliance and advocacy organization, not a law firm; nothing here is legal advice. Attorney advertising. Referrals and consultations are free, and alliance attorneys work on contingency. Support is available 24/7 at the RAINN hotline, 800-656-4673.
No. As of this reporting he has stepped aside temporarily while the archdiocese investigates; his long-term status depends on the outcome of that review.
Two prior allegations, from 2021 and 2022, were investigated and resolved in his favor, including a 2021 finding by Illinois child welfare officials of no credible evidence.
Yes, generally until the survivor's 38th birthday or within 20 years of connecting the injury to the abuse, whichever is later, since that abuse predates the state's 2014 change.
No. An internal ministry decision and a civil lawsuit are separate tracks; a civil claim is decided on its own evidence and legal deadlines regardless of the archdiocese's internal outcome.