Home / Articles / House Passes Bill to Make Sexual Abuse C

House Passes Bill to Make Sexual Abuse Civil Settlement Proceeds Tax-Free

In April 2026, the House of Representatives cleared a bipartisan bill -- formally designated H.R. 2347 -- that would amend the federal tax code so that survivors of sexual abuse no longer owe federal income taxes on civil settlement proceeds from cases against their abusers. The legislation, pending Senate action, removes a financial disincentive that has long discouraged survivors from seeking accountability through the courts.

Survivor Justice Alliance · 2026-07-06 · 5 min read

Reviewed by Survivor Justice Alliance · Updated 2026-07-06

Key takeaways

  • H.R. 2347, a federal bill targeting the tax treatment of civil settlement proceeds, cleared the House in April 2026 with bipartisan support; it would amend the tax code so sexual abuse settlements are explicitly exempt from federal income taxation.
  • If enacted, the bill would amend the Internal Revenue Code so that money received through a civil settlement or judgment arising from sexual abuse would not be treated as taxable income at the federal level.
  • The legislation addresses a longstanding inequity: survivors who successfully pursue civil justice can face a tax bill on their recovery, effectively reducing the compensation they actually receive.
  • The bill's passage in the House is the first step; Senate passage and presidential signature are required before it becomes law, making continued advocacy important.
TAX-FREE JUSTICE
Survivor Justice Tax Prevention Act: Key Facts
H.R. 2347
Bill number of the Survivor Justice Tax Prevention Act, passed by the House in April 2026 with bipartisan support
Bipartisan
Sponsors include one Republican (PA) and one Democrat (WI) -- reflecting broad congressional agreement
Section 104
Existing IRC provision governing physical-injury exclusions -- the bill would amend it to explicitly cover sexual abuse settlements
Senate Pending
The bill must still pass the Senate and receive presidential signature before it becomes law

H.R. 2347 passed the House in April 2026. Senate passage is the next step before survivors benefit from the explicit tax exclusion.

What the Survivor Justice Tax Prevention Act Does

Under current federal tax law, compensation received in a lawsuit is generally excluded from taxable income only when it is paid for physical injuries or physical sickness under Section 104 of the Internal Revenue Code. Courts and the IRS have interpreted this provision to exclude settlements for sexual assault in some circumstances, but the application has been inconsistent, leaving many survivors uncertain whether their settlement proceeds will be taxed. The bipartisan House bill H.R. 2347 -- known informally as the Survivor Justice Tax Prevention measure -- would close that gap by explicitly amending the tax code to exclude civil settlement proceeds arising from sexual abuse from federal taxable income.

The measure was introduced by Representatives Lloyd Smucker (R-PA) and Gwen Moore (D-WI) and cleared the House in April 2026. The bipartisan nature of the legislation reflects a growing consensus in Congress that survivors who succeed in civil litigation should not face a federal tax bill as a consequence of doing so. The legislation responds to documented cases in which survivors received civil settlements and then discovered that a significant portion of their recovery was owed to the Internal Revenue Service, undermining the deterrent purpose of civil accountability and the compensatory purpose of the settlement itself.

This Alliance supports every development that strengthens civil accountability for survivors and removes barriers to pursuing it. The potential tax obligation on settlement proceeds has been an underreported disincentive for many survivors who consult with attorneys and weigh the costs and benefits of litigation. A civil case takes years, involves significant emotional labor, and produces uncertain outcomes. Learning that a settlement may itself be taxable adds another layer of burden. H.R. 2347 addresses that burden directly.

Why This Matters for Civil Accountability

Civil litigation serves purposes that the criminal justice system cannot. Criminal prosecutions require proof beyond a reasonable doubt, are controlled by prosecutors rather than survivors, and often result in no charges even when the evidence of harm is substantial. Civil cases can be brought by survivors themselves, operate under a preponderance-of-the-evidence standard, and can reach institutional defendants -- employers, dioceses, universities, and other organizations -- that may bear responsibility for creating conditions in which abuse occurred. Settlement proceeds in civil cases represent compensation for harm: for medical costs, lost earnings, pain and suffering, and the long-term consequences of trauma.

Taxing that compensation has never been defensible on its merits. The proceeds are not investment income, salary, or profit -- they are recovery for injury. The inconsistent application of existing tax law to sexual abuse settlements has created a situation in which some survivors who file civil claims and succeed may ultimately receive less than they expected after accounting for a federal tax liability they did not anticipate. H.R. 2347 corrects that anomaly by making the exclusion explicit and predictable.

Survivors who are currently consulting with attorneys about whether to pursue a civil claim should understand that the legislation is not yet law -- it passed the House but must also pass the Senate before it takes effect. The current state of the law remains uncertain in many cases, and a qualified civil attorney can assess how the existing Section 104 framework applies to the specific facts of a particular claim. The Survivor Justice Alliance connects survivors with experienced civil attorneys at no cost and with no obligation.

What Survivors and Advocates Can Do Now

The Senate's consideration of H.R. 2347 is the critical next step. Survivor advocacy organizations and civil rights groups have historically played an important role in moving legislation through the Senate by making visible the human impact of provisions that otherwise appear abstract. Survivors who have experience navigating a tax bill after a civil settlement, or who are currently weighing whether to pursue a civil claim in part because of uncertainty about tax treatment, may find it valuable to contact their senators in support of the legislation.

For survivors who are in the process of evaluating a civil claim, the tax treatment of potential proceeds is one factor among many to discuss with a qualified attorney. The more important questions typically involve the statute of limitations that applies to the specific claim, the identity of the institutional and individual defendants who may bear liability, the strength of the available evidence, and the realistic value of the claim given the applicable legal theories. The Survivor Justice Alliance exists to connect survivors with experienced civil attorneys who can provide that analysis for free and in confidence.

Any survivor who has not yet consulted with a civil attorney should not allow uncertainty about the tax treatment of a potential settlement to deter that conversation. A free, confidential consultation carries no obligation and is the only way to assess whether and how the civil justice system can respond to what happened. The National Sexual Assault Hotline (RAINN) is also available 24/7 at 800-656-4673 for any survivor who needs emotional support while making these decisions.

5 Things Survivors Should Know About Civil Settlement Taxes

The tax treatment of civil settlement proceeds is more complicated than most survivors expect. Here is what matters most when evaluating the financial dimensions of a civil claim.

  1. Not all settlement proceeds are taxed the same way: Federal tax law distinguishes between physical-injury recoveries (generally excluded) and other types of damages (taxable). Sexual abuse claims sit in an ambiguous zone that H.R. 2347 would resolve explicitly.
  2. Attorney fees complicate the math: On contingency cases, survivors often owe tax on the gross settlement amount even though they actually receive only the net amount after attorney fees. This is a well-documented anomaly in tax law that affects many civil plaintiffs.
  3. Punitive damages are almost always taxable under current law: Even if compensatory proceeds are excluded, punitive damages awarded in a civil case are typically taxable as income. H.R. 2347 would not necessarily change this for the punitive component.
  4. State income tax rules differ from federal rules: H.R. 2347 only affects federal income tax. Each state has its own treatment of civil settlement proceeds, and some states may still impose a state income tax even if the federal exclusion applies.
  5. A tax attorney or CPA should review any settlement before finalization: The financial implications of a civil settlement are best evaluated by both a civil litigation attorney and a tax professional. Understanding the after-tax value of a settlement is part of informed decision-making.

Sources

  1. House Passes Rep. Smucker's Sexual Assault Survivor Justice Legislation — U.S. House of Representatives -- Congressman Lloyd Smucker
  2. SOL Tracker and Legislative Updates 2026 — Child USA

The Survivor Justice Alliance is an attorney alliance and advocacy organization, not a law firm; nothing here is legal advice. Attorney advertising. Referrals and consultations are free, and alliance attorneys work on contingency. Support is available 24/7 at the RAINN hotline, 800-656-4673.

Related

Questions

Common Questions

The bill as drafted applies to future settlements. It is not retroactive. Survivors who received settlement proceeds in prior tax years and paid federal income tax on them would not automatically receive a refund under the current version of the legislation.

The Alliance is a national network of attorneys focused on survivor civil justice. Connecting with a member attorney through the Alliance is free, carries no obligation, and the consultation is confidential. Member attorneys typically work on contingency, meaning no attorney fee unless they recover for you.

Civil and criminal cases are separate proceedings. A civil claim can proceed even if the criminal system declined to prosecute, acquitted, or has already resolved the case. The standards of proof and the parties who control the case are fundamentally different.