A sworn court declaration filed this month claims a Vermont diocese's leadership floated a plan to move money out of reach of abuse survivors years before the diocese ever filed for bankruptcy. The allegation lands in the middle of an already tense fight over roughly half a billion dollars in parish property.
Reviewed by Survivor Justice Alliance · Updated 2026-07-17
Figures drawn from court filings and reporting on the diocese's ongoing Chapter 11 reorganization case.
According to a sworn declaration filed July 9, 2026 in the diocese's ongoing Chapter 11 case, a candidate interviewing in 2020 for the diocese's top finance position says she was asked directly whether she would be willing to help prepare paperwork to move diocesan money out of reach before any abuse-related judgments could be collected. She has described the exchange as an unmistakable request to help shield church assets in anticipation of future litigation, not a routine budgeting conversation.
The candidate says she gave a noncommittal answer and left the interview unsettled by what she had been asked. She was informed later that day that the position had gone to someone else. Her account, now part of the bankruptcy record, does not by itself prove that any transfer occurred as a result of that conversation, but it adds firsthand testimony to a broader dispute over how the diocese handled its finances in the years before it sought bankruptcy protection.
The diocese filed for Chapter 11 reorganization in the fall of 2024, after a series of earlier settlements had already cut deeply into its available funds. The new declaration does not change the diocese's bankruptcy filing itself, but it gives survivors' attorneys a sworn, on-the-record account to point to as they argue that the diocese's asset structure deserves closer scrutiny.
Diocesan leadership has pushed back firmly on how the allegation has been characterized. A spokesperson for the diocese described the underlying idea as ordinary financial stewardship, saying there was nothing improper about an organization taking steps to protect its own assets. The diocese's position is that any responsible institution facing potential litigation would look for lawful ways to plan around that risk, and that doing so is fundamentally different from illegally hiding money from creditors who are entitled to collect on a judgment.
Survivors' attorneys see it differently. They argue that the timing and framing described in the declaration, a proposal raised specifically in the context of abuse lawsuits and specifically about ensuring nothing would be left to satisfy a judgment, crosses from prudent planning into an attempt to defeat future claims before they were even filed. That disagreement over intent, not over whether the conversation happened, is likely to shape how much weight the bankruptcy court gives the new testimony.
Neither side disputes that the diocese's finances have been under a magnifying glass for months. A federal judge overseeing the case has already voiced frustration that nearly two years and roughly $2 million in legal fees have produced no workable reorganization plan, a timeline that predates this latest allegation but that now forms the backdrop against which it will be evaluated.
The sworn declaration surfaced alongside a separate and larger dispute that has been building for months: whether roughly $500 million in property held by nearly seventy local parishes should be treated as available diocesan assets or kept off-limits to creditors. Two decades ago, diocesan leadership placed each parish's real estate and holdings into its own individual trust, structured for what were described as pious, charitable, and educational purposes.
Survivors' attorneys argue that structure was set up, at least in part, to insulate the bulk of the diocese's wealth from exactly the kind of claims now working through the bankruptcy case, and they have asked the court to treat the trusts as improper transfers that can be unwound under state fraudulent-transfer law. The diocese counters that the trusts reflect longstanding, legitimate church governance over parish property that predates any specific abuse litigation.
More than a hundred survivors currently have claims pending in the case, on top of dozens already resolved in earlier settlements. How the court eventually rules on the parish-trust question will largely determine how much money is actually available to fund whatever reorganization plan the diocese is ultimately required to produce.
This diocese is one of more than forty Catholic entities across the country that have sought Chapter 11 protection at least in part because of abuse-related liability, and disputes over what counts as a diocese's assets versus a legally separate parish's assets have recurred in nearly every one of those cases. How a bankruptcy court resolves that question in one state often becomes a reference point survivors' attorneys and diocesan counsel cite in the next.
A hearing on the parish-trust question is scheduled for later this month, and the court has separately ordered the diocese to present a comprehensive reorganization proposal by fall or face the possibility that the case could be dismissed altogether, which would lift the bankruptcy's automatic pause and allow paused lawsuits to move forward individually again.
The Alliance does not represent any party in this bankruptcy proceeding and does not provide legal advice. Survivors who have claims pending against a diocese in Chapter 11, or who are unsure whether an ongoing bankruptcy affects their ability to pursue a civil claim, should have their situation reviewed by an attorney experienced in institutional abuse litigation.
Beneath the headline allegation, several distinct questions are working their way through the same bankruptcy case at once:
The Survivor Justice Alliance is an attorney alliance and advocacy organization, not a law firm; nothing here is legal advice. Attorney advertising. Referrals and consultations are free, and alliance attorneys work on contingency. Support is available 24/7 at the RAINN hotline, 800-656-4673.
Chapter 11 lets an institution facing more claims than it can pay individually pause pending lawsuits and instead resolve all claims together through a single court-supervised process, often funded by a dedicated survivors' trust.
It depends on when the trust was created and why. Courts distinguish between longstanding, legitimate property arrangements and transfers made specifically to keep assets away from creditors, which can potentially be unwound as fraudulent transfers.
Dismissal removes the automatic pause on lawsuits, meaning survivors' individual claims could resume moving through the regular court system rather than through a consolidated settlement process.
Not directly. It primarily affects how much money may ultimately be available for the claims still pending, and it may factor into how the court evaluates the diocese's overall conduct during the case.